CPPE’s position comes amid renewed calls for a return to fuel subsidy, including a pledge by former Vice-President Atiku Abubakar to restore a targeted petrol subsidy if elected in 2027.
The Centre for the Promotion of Private Enterprise (CPPE) has cautioned against restoring the petrol subsidy, describing the policy as fiscally unsustainable despite the severe economic pressures caused by rising petrol prices.
It added that the recent increase in fuel prices also worsened the competitiveness challenges confronting businesses, particularly micro, small and medium enterprises (MSMEs).
CPPE’s position comes amid renewed calls for a return to fuel subsidy, including a pledge by former Vice-President Atiku Abubakar to restore a targeted petrol subsidy if elected in 2027.
The organisation said the subsidy debate should not be reduced to the issue of pump prices, arguing that it has wider implications for Nigeria’s fiscal sustainability, foreign exchange stability, investment, domestic refining, industrialisation, employment and energy security.
“The central policy question is therefore not whether Nigeria should return to the old subsidy regime, but how to preserve the gains of the reform while reducing its social costs and translating the resulting fiscal space into tangible improvements in citizens’ welfare,” CPPE said.
According to the think tank, Nigeria previously spent an estimated $10 billion to $15 billion annually on petroleum-product imports before the subsidy reform.
It said subsidy and under-recovery obligations also consumed significant public resources, constrained remittances to the Federation Account and intensified fiscal pressures.
CPPE said artificially low domestic petrol prices also encouraged arbitrage and cross-border diversion, effectively resulting in Nigerian public resources subsidising fuel consumption outside the country.
“The old regime was therefore not merely a subsidy problem; it was a major fiscal, foreign-exchange and resource-allocation problem,” the think tank said.
The group said the shift to market-based petrol pricing had improved the commercial viability of domestic refining by creating stronger investment incentives in the sector.
The think tank argued that a competitive domestic refining industry would generate opportunities beyond petrol production, including in diesel, aviation fuel, petrochemicals, fertiliser, plastics, chemicals, logistics, storage and maritime services.
“Domestic refining also conserves foreign exchange through import substitution, creates export opportunities and retains refining, engineering, logistics and technical jobs within the Nigerian economy,” CPPE said.
It urged Nigeria to pursue the transition from dependence on imported petroleum products to becoming “a competitive regional refining and petrochemical hub.”
CPPE acknowledged that subsidy removal had increased revenues available to the federal, state and local governments but said higher government revenues alone could not justify the reform.
“Citizens must see tangible benefits through improved public transportation, electricity, healthcare, education, food security, infrastructure and social protection,” it said.
The organisation said the debate should now focus increasingly on fiscal accountability and the quality of government spending.
It called on the three tiers of government to transparently demonstrate how the additional resources arising from the reform were being used to improve economic and social outcomes.
The group also stressed the need to distinguish the price increase associated with subsidy removal from more recent increases attributed to movements in global crude oil and refined-product prices.
According to CPPE, petrol was selling at about N774 to N800 per litre before the latest escalation in international energy prices, while prices subsequently rose above N1,300 per litre amid what it described as a sharp increase in global energy prices linked to the Middle East crisis.
“It would therefore be incorrect to attribute the entirety of the latest petrol-price increase to subsidy removal,” the organisation said.
The think tank described the two developments as separate issues requiring different policy responses: the first, a domestic structural reform involving the transition to market-based pricing, and the second, an external commodity price shock.
CPPE said restoring a universal petrol subsidy could recreate the fiscal and foreign-exchange pressures that prompted the reform.
Using an estimated petrol consumption benchmark of 50 million litres per day and an indicative subsidy requirement of N1,050 per litre, the organisation estimated that the potential subsidy exposure could amount to about ₦ 152.5 billion daily, N1.575 trillion monthly, and approximately N19.16 trillion annually.
It described the figure as an annual burden of about N20 trillion, while acknowledging that the actual cost would depend on factors including consumption, crude oil prices, exchange rates, refining or landing costs, and the regulated pump price.
CPPE also warned that consumption could increase under a subsidy regime as price differentials could recreate incentives for cross-border diversion.
“An annual subsidy bill approaching N20 trillion would impose an enormous opportunity cost,” it said.
According to the organisation, such spending could compete with funding for infrastructure, education, healthcare, security, agriculture and social protection, while potentially widening the fiscal deficit and increasing borrowing and debt-service pressures.
It further warned that increased government borrowing could crowd out private-sector credit, sustain high interest rates and weaken investment, productivity, job creation and economic growth.
“Nigeria would therefore risk replacing an energy-price problem with a much larger fiscal, debt, foreign-exchange and investment problem,” CPPE said.
