The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC, has opposed the application filed by former Minister of Petroleum, Diezani Alison-Madueke, to present evidence of her acquittal by the Southwark Crown Court, London in UK.
EFCC, in a further counter-affidavit to Diezani’s request, prayed Justice Inyang Ekwo to dismiss the application.
The commission argued that the purported acquittal of Diezani by a foreign criminal court was not material or relevant to the specific issues for determination before the instant court.
On July 1, reported that Justice Ekwo granted the application filed by the ex-minister to present evidence of the London court.
The judge had granted the motion on notice moved by lawyer who appeared for Diezani, Godwin Iyinbor, after it was not challenged by the EFCC’s counsel, Mofesomo Oyetibo, SAN.
The UK court had, on June 17, discharged and acquitted the embattled former minister in respect of criminal allegations of bribery brought against her.
Against this development, Diezani, in a suit filed before Justice Ekwo, sought to reclaim her forfeited assets.
In the amended originating motion marked: FHC/ABJ/CS/21/2023, she sued the EFCC as sole respondent.
On the last adjourned date, Iyinbor had moved a motion seeking the permission to file a further/supplementary affidavit for the purpose of bringing fresh and material development with respect to Diezani’s acquittal by the UK court.
After Oyetibo did not raise objection to filing the application, the judge granted Iyinbor’s prayer.
Meanwhile, after Diezani’s lawyer filed her further/supplementary affidavit, the anti-graft agency responded.
In a further counter-affidavit deposed to by Oyakhilome Ekienabor, a litigation officer in Oyetibo’s law firm, the EFCC opposed Diezani’s request to present the evidence.
When the case was called on Tuesday, Mrs Queen-Ubokutom Uwe, who appeared for Diezani, informed the court that the matter was slated for the hearing of the EFCC’s preliminary objection and their originating motion.
She, however, told the court that the commission had just served them with a motion prior to the commencement of hearing.
Uwe said the motion was the respondent’s further counter-affidavit to their further/supplementary affidavit.
She equally reminded the court of their motion to regularise their processes.
Responding, Paul Mgbeoma, counsel for the respondent, expressed surprise at which Diezani kept filing processes in the matter as though it was an election petition case.
Mgbeoma then told the court that he was ready to proceed with the hearing.
Justice Ekwo consequently fixed Nov. 11 for hearing of the motions.
NAN observes that in the EFCC’s further counter-affidavit, dated and filed Oct. 5, Ekienabor averred that some of the depositions in Diezani’s application were misleading, immaterial and irrelevant to the substantive issues for determination in her present suit.
