News

Kwara Govt Drags Saraki To Court Over Alleged Criminal Defamation Of Gov AbdulRazaq

The Kwara State Government has filed a criminal defamation charge against former Senate President, Dr. Bukola Saraki, at the Kwara State High Court, over alleged false statements against Governor Abdulrahman Abdulrazaq.

The charge, instituted by the Attorney-General and Commissioner for Justice, Senior Ibrahim Sulyman, alongside the Director of Public Prosecutions, Ayoola Idowu Akande, and Assistant Chief State Counsel, B.L. Abdulsalam, accused Saraki of publishing defamatory claims on social media and in newspaper publications.

According to the prosecution, Saraki, on or about April 17, 2026, allegedly circulated statements across Facebook, X (formerly Twitter) and other media platforms, claiming that Governor AbdulRazaq did not possess secondary school educational qualifications. The state government described the claim as false, malicious, and capable of provoking public unrest.

The prosecution further argued that the publication was made in insulting and derogatory language and was capable of breaching public peace, contrary to Section 399 of the Penal Code Law of Kwara State.

At Wednesday’s proceedings, prosecution counsel, R.O. Balogun, informed the court that the matter was fixed for arraignment but the defendant was absent despite being duly served. He therefore urged the court to issue a bench warrant for Saraki’s arrest, arguing that his legal representative’s presence confirmed awareness of the case.

However, counsel to the defendant, Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN) Jimoh Mumini, challenged the jurisdiction of the State High Court, insisting that the matter falls within the jurisdiction of the Federal High Court. He also faulted the alleged mode of service, arguing that Saraki had not been properly served with the charge.

After a brief recess, the trial judge, Justice M.O. Folorunso, held that the defendant was entitled to seek an adjournment and directed parties to return for hearing of preliminary objections.

The court subsequently adjourned the matter to July 3 for hearing of the preliminary objection and possible arraignment.

FOLLOW US

FOR MORE HERE

More details here…