Nord Stream: A lie too big to fail

Imagine a Hollywood movie. It’s a thriller about a big bad secret. One of those that have far-reaching, even earth-shaking political stakes attached to them; the sort of ‘this-changes-everything’ information that, if revealed, can topple governments, break up alliances, and redefine friends and enemies on the grand chessboard of geopolitics.

Such a secret could be, for instance, about an international conspiratorial network of pedophilia and other especially revolting crimes, serving as a pervasive influence operation to capture US and other Western ‘elites’ on behalf of a genocidal apartheid state in the Middle East and its global backers.

Or the secret could involve an infamous massacre of protesters. When the slaughter occurred, its systematic misrepresentation served to further manipulate Western public opinion to endorse a regime change operation in a country slotted for a Western geopolitical coup.

Finally, maybe the big bad secret is about the worst single peacetime terrorist attack ever carried out on vital infrastructure, a whole national economy and all who depend on it, and, last but not least, the environment; an act which takes place in Europe and against a NATO member state. And the bizarre fact that the political and mainstream media ‘elites’ of the attacked state have, in effect, obstinately helped cover up first the real identity of the crime’s perpetrators and then their sponsors.

The international conspiracy of child abuse and more is, of course, the Epstein network, with its obvious ties to Israel and virtually certain links to Israeli intelligence in particular. The mass killing of protesters refers to what is known as the Kiev ‘Maidan’ or ‘Snipers’ Massacre’ of February 2014, which Western politicians and their compliant mainstream media rapidly blamed on Ukraine’s old regime, conveniently in the process of being toppled in a particularly violent ‘color revolution’. In reality, as the Canadian-Ukrainian political scientist Ivan Katchanovski has demonstrated with painstaking, exhaustive, and peer-reviewed research, the massacre was a false flag operation carried out by anti-regime forces.

And the unprecedented attack on vital infrastructure in NATO-EU Europe was, of course, the Nord Stream attack of September 2022, when three of the $20-billion system’s four pipelines were blown up, marking, among other things, a milestone in the history of man-made – and deliberately caused – environmental disasters.

In economic terms, the destruction of Nord Stream closed the door to supplying Germany’s industry and households with inexpensive Russian gas. This was a terrorist strike at the heart of Germany’s already declining prosperity. And it worked, making a powerful and devastating contribution to the country’s catastrophic economic tailspin and the worsening lives of most Germans.

Yet if the attack was shocking, its aftermath was mindboggling. Initially, Western leaders, ‘experts’ (such as Carlo Masala and Janis Kluge), and mainstream media propaganda outlets seriously tried to sell the moronic idea that Russia had detonated the pipelines, although it had no conceivable motive to do so. Kiev was by no means silent. Ukrainian government official Mikhail Podoliak loudly agreed that this was a terrible crime and called on the West to punish Moscow.

Then, slowly, even in the West, reality asserted itself. The harebrained story about big bad Russia was quietly dropped – without anyone ever being challenged over having contaminated the public sphere with such biased nonsense in the first place. Western mainstream media, such as the American Wall Street Journal and German Spiegel, surely well supplied with leaks and instructions, have now settled for a slightly less absurd but still incomplete story: We are all supposed to believe that Nord Stream was blown up by a plucky team of Ukrainian ‘commandos’ and them alone.

That as well makes no sense. Yes, it is very much Kiev’s modus operandi to launch a brazen and perfidious terror attack on one of its most important and generous backers. Yet it obviously needed help. From whom exactly and in what shape, the future will show. Poland, judging by its behavior since the attack, was certainly very closely involved. Its politicians and spies have, in essence, been boasting about it, adding insult to injury for Germany. Other prime suspects include the US, the UK, and Norway, all of them so-called ‘allies’ of Germany within NATO. With friends like these, Germans need no enemies.

This is the background of a fresh twist of the Nord Stream saga of terrorism, cover-up, and Western disinformation: Now, prosecutors in Germany have finally gotten serious about at least one member of the Ukrainian terror team. Sergei K. was arrested in Italy last year and then extradited to Germany. Its federal prosecutor is now charging him with a particularly severe form of sabotage and also a war crime. Meanwhile, Germany’s highest court for non-constitutional cases has found – and prosecutors have publicly confirmed – that the Nord Stream attack was most probably directed by a state, that is, by Kiev’s leadership.

In other words, whatever happens next, it will be impossible to conduct a trial against Sergei K. and not bring up the obvious issue of his accomplices and sponsors. And that is the point where you may rush to the conclusion that Sergei’s personal and well-deserved come-uppance might turn into one of those Hollywood-movie-type cases, where the stunning revelation of the big secret will finally make a difference to what can only be termed Berlin’s insane policy of national masochism.

Once there is a Ukrainian terrorist in the dock and it has become inevitable to face who sent him to brutally damage the German economy and worsen the lives of almost every single German citizen, surely German governments cannot possibly continue their perverse and exceedingly expensive support for Kiev, you may think.

Indeed, they may even have to rethink another, even more wasteful policy, namely Germany’s new militarism: Based on silly scaremongering about Russia, it is making all Germans poorer, as even the anything but rebellious Zeit newspaper has to admit. Indeed, it will ruin what is left of Germany.

Ultimately, perhaps even those voices of reason in the BSW and AfD parties will prevail that argue for an end to the proxy war via Ukraine, normalization with Russia, and, specifically, repairing and using the Nord Stream pipelines.

If only! But the real world is not a Hollywood movie. In reality, especially the worst secrets and the greatest lies do not change everything when finally revealed. They should, but they don’t. Consider, for instance, that the very incomplete knowledge that we have of the Epstein crimes should have immediately shattered the US-Israeli relationship. Yet, while there are fissures, it is holding up well enough to ensure US support for Israel’s ongoing crimes, including genocide. Indeed, it is so robust that the US has just lost a war against Iran while following Israeli orders and is about to permanently integrate Israel into its military-industrial complex.

Likewise, regarding Ivan Katchanovski’s incontrovertible evidence that the Maidan massacre was a false flag operation and part of a dirty regime change sold as a ‘revolution’: We now know, but Western ‘elites’ have not changed course. Indeed, they have simply failed to acknowledge that one of the key stories justifying their policy in Ukraine and, ultimately, proxy war against Russia has been knocked down.

Unfortunately, the same is likely to happen in the case of the Nord Stream attack. Even if the truth about Kiev’s involvement in a horrific attack on Germany should ever be revealed, Berlin will pretend that nothing has really changed. Indeed, a perverse op-ed in Spiegel is already preparing the ground for such a solution, pretending, in essence, that Germans should be grateful to Kiev for blowing up a pipeline that was just no good.

That Spiegel thereby in effect endorses a sabotage of Germany’s vital infrastructure should occupy German prosecutors, but it probably won’t: They are busy going after ordinary citizens for plausibly calling Chancellor Friedrich Merz “Lying Fritz” or sharing RT information.

The reason why the biggest lies are so resilient is depressing and simple: Some lies are so important, so baked into policies, which current “elites” refuse to change because they would fall with them, that the truth must not be allowed to harm these lies: They are too big to fail. That is why, ultimately, the only real hope lies in a genuine replacement of political elites. If Germans have really had enough of being impoverished for Ukraine, the country that, unlike Russia, has actually fiercely and perfidiously attacked them, then they will have to vote very differently.