National

EDITORIAL: Deaths In NSCDC Custody: Questions Begging For Answers

Thirty-seven people went into NSCDC custody in Minna and did not come out alive. They were arrested on September 15 and 16 during raids on suspected illegal mining sites around the Wushishi and Lukoto areas of Niger State.

Between 65 and 67 people were reportedly held at the NSCDC facility on David Mark Road. By the early hours of September 17, thirty-seven were dead.

The agency’s first explanation was a disease outbreak. Survivor accounts tell a harder story.

Dauda Shehu told the Associated Press the cell had little ventilation, and that when people began struggling to breathe, banging on the door brought no response.

Other survivors have alleged that officers sprayed an unidentified substance into the cell before detainees started collapsing.

That allegation has not been independently established and must not be treated as a proven cause of death, but it cannot be waved off either.

A Minna General Hospital spokesperson told Reuters the bodies showed blister and bite marks, with brown fluid observed coming from the mouths and noses of some of the deceased.

Those details do not settle what killed the detainees. They do make the conditions inside that cell central to the investigation.

One fact should not get lost here. These were suspects, not convicts, arrested over allegations of illegal mining. The moment the state took them into custody, it assumed responsibility for keeping them alive. Detention is not a licence to suspend that obligation.

This is not the first time an overcrowded Nigerian cell has become a place where people die in numbers, and that history is the most uncomfortable part of the Minna story.

In 2012, a carpenter named Saleh Jega was arrested in Maiduguri and spent fifteen months at Giwa Barracks, where Amnesty International later documented cells so crowded detainees took turns sitting down, with restricted ventilation tied to deaths by suffocation.

A senior military officer gave Amnesty a list of 683 detainees who died there over five months, and estimated close to 5,000 deaths since the start of 2013.

That estimate was never an official count and shouldn’t be treated as one, but the documented deaths alone exposed a custodial system in serious trouble.

The warning then was plain: lock people into overcrowded cells without ventilation, water or medical care, and detention itself becomes a threat to life.

More than a decade later, Minna asks whether that warning was ever heard.

The problem is not confined to one cell either. As of February, this year, the Nigerian Correctional Service put the national inmate population at 80,812, out of whom 51,955, about 64 percent, were awaiting trial.

NSCDC facilities are not correctional centres, and the two operate under different arrangements, but Minna reflects the same instinct: once people are arrested, the concern becomes where to put them rather than whether they can be held safely.

The Federal Government has suspended Commandant Suberu Siyaka Aniviye and other personnel, and constituted a ten-member committee to investigate.

That is a start, not an answer. The committee needs to establish how many people were in each cell, what the cell’s actual capacity and ventilation were, whether water and medical attention were available, and what happened between the first signs of distress and the deaths.

The spray allegation and the autopsy findings both need forensic testing, not assumption in either direction. Nigeria does not need an investigation built around a preferred explanation.

It needs one that follows the evidence.
Accountability has to reach past whoever was on duty that night.

Someone authorised the raid. Someone decided where to hold the detainees and whether the facility could take them. If the cell was overcrowded, someone knew or should have known. If officers were alerted to detainees in distress, someone had a duty to respond, and the inquiry cannot stop at the Commandant’s office.

There is a harder question beneath the arrests themselves.

NEITI’s 2023 data recorded 393 registered artisanal mining cooperatives representing 4,663 miners nationwide, against 790 small-scale mining leases issued out of 2,833 licences that year.

Those numbers shouldn’t be read as a precise headcount of illegal miners, but they reveal a wide gap between the size of Nigeria’s artisanal mining workforce and the reach of its licensing system.

Raids can shut down individual sites, but they do not touch the economic conditions that keep people mining outside the law, and when those raids produce more arrests than a facility can safely hold, one failure feeds directly into the next.

None of this is complicated to fix. Every detention facility needs an enforceable cap on cell occupancy, tied to actual measured capacity rather than officer discretion.

Ventilation, water and medical access need to be baseline requirements, not discoveries made after people start dying. And there needs to be a real clock on detention, so lawyers are informed, families know where detainees are held, and holding someone past the legal limit carries consequences for whoever ignores it.

Thirty-seven names are now public, several of them teenagers, according to Reuters.

Families in Minna are burying people who were alive days ago and, as far as the record shows, uncharged with any crime.

Nigeria has been warned about conditions like this before, through Giwa Barracks and through a correctional system where nearly two in three inmates await trial.

The families are owed a genuinely independent finding and real accountability.

The country is owed detention standards that make a repeat of this physically impossible, not merely embarrassing to explain once the bodies are removed.

Anything short of that turns thirty-seven deaths into one more entry in a list Nigeria keeps adding to and never closes.